Pidcock Family
September 07, 2010, 04:11:39 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the Pidcock Website
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 9
 1 
 on: December 07, 2007, 02:59:46 PM 
Started by Stephen Pidcock - Last post by Stephen
Do not confuse these two: Benjamin Pidcock (1768 -1835), as they were both clergy!

Acknowledge: http://www.wishful-thinking.org.uk/genuki/DBY/Youlgreave/MIs.html

Youlgreave, Derbyshire - Memorial Inscriptions


A75.    Elizabeth HENZY, w/o
The Reverend John Fisher GARRETT. B.A
And 3rd d/o The Reverend
Benjamin PIDCOCK. A.M.
Late Vicar of Youlgrave,
Born, XXIII Feb MDCCCII,
Died XVIII Oct MDCCCLIII

A76.    Maria, 8th d/o of The Reverend
Benjamin PIDCOCK. A.M.
Born XXVI May MDCCCXIII,
Died III June MDCCCLIII
Anne PIDCOCK, 5th d/o of
the above named Vicar of Youlgreave,
Born, V Nov MDCCCVI,
Died XXXI Dec MDCCCLXIX

A77.    Susan Elizabeth, infant d/o
The Rev John Fisher GARRETT. B.A.
And Elizabeth his wife
Who died of Scarlet Fever, aged 2yrs
& 9 months,
on the XVIth Of Nov MDCCCXXXIX

 2 
 on: November 22, 2007, 09:25:52 AM 
Started by Stephen - Last post by Stephen
Pidcock DNA Study – by Cathy Pidcock Thomas

http://www.pidcock-family.org/DNA/DNA.htm

What is the Pidcock DNA Study?

The Pidcock name is rare and one would suppose that all North American Pidcocks trace their roots to Derbyshire England where the name has been prevalent since the 16th century. Pidcocks crossed the Atlantic starting in the 17th century and the precise genealogical connections with England faded as memories and the paper trail were lost.

At the 90th Pidcock Reunion in Pennsylvania, three men gazed at the family scrapbook postcards of Bakewell and Matlock under the caption “The Pidcock family is believed to come from Derbyshire England”. One, a recent Pidcock emigrant from Derbyshire said “I’ve been reading about Genetic Genealogy and the use of DNA to unravel mysteries like Thomas Jefferson’s offspring, or the existence of a Cohain DNA signature among Jews. If the price of this test ever became reasonable for ordinary people, I’d be glad to do the test as an example of a Pidcock from Derbyshire, England”. The other two men, a Pitcock and a Pidcock, with genealogical trails back to 17th century Pennsylvania agreed, hoping that DNA would also show the relationship between their families that logic dictated but for which no hard evidence survived.

By 2004 the price for a simple 12 marker Y-chromosome test was only $99. We decided to establish the Pidcock / Pitcock DNA Project. We knew genealogy, tracing our Pidcock / Pitcock (the names were used interchangeably in England) roots and reconnecting individuals to the family tree when the paper trail was missing, was of wide interest and family benefit.

What is Genetic Genealogy?

The discipline of genetic genealogy is new. It differs from medical genetics which studies specific sites, related to a disease or inherited trait, on any of the 23 pairs of human chromosomes. It differs from forensic genetics that seeks a unique genetic fingerprint, using sites on all the human chromosomes, to identify a specific individual. It differs from paternity tests that seek to assess the possibility of paternity for a son or a daughter. We are interested in a surname and in our culture that surname is passed down the male line.  Genetically, a single copy of the Y-chromosome unambiguously passes from father to son with a high degree of replication reliability. A son has only 1 copy and he got it from his biological father who got it from his biological father on back through history.  So, using the  “junk” (medically unimportant) sections of the Y-Chromosome for surname genealogical studies is a good choice, because not only does it track with the family surname but it also has no medical or forensic use.

The goal of genealogy is to recognize families down through generations. Between individuals in the family, the goal is to recognize whether a common ancestor occurred long ago, as in the case of distant cousins, or just a few generations ago as in second or third cousins.

Researchers found recognizable locations on the Y-chromosome, called “markers” (with names like “DYS 391”). At each marker, a contiguous DNA sequence recurs as many as 8-40 times, depending on the marker. The numeric value (count) associated with each marker is the number of repetitions of its DNA sequence for an individual. The set markers and counts is an individuals Y-DNA signature – quite coarse at 12 markers and quite refined at 67 markers. At every conception of a son, the father passes on a copy of his own Y-chromosome. The replication is highly reliable, but not perfect, especially in the junk regions where an increase or decrease in marker count has no biological consequences. So a son probably has the same signature as his father, at worst off by one.

Some markers are very stable and the counts for the markers in a man today are very close to those of his ancestor 500 or a 1000 years ago. Other markers are prone to more frequent mutation, either by adding an extra repetition or by losing one, so that differences within the last 500 years can be detected. Mutations are random hiccups in the replication process that occur at conception, if at all. Once the conceived baby, grows up, he passes the mutation to all his offspring, thus producing a branch from the original Y-DNA signature. Subsequent generations pass along this mutation and may introduce other mutations at later conceptions. If we have a big enough test population, we can cluster people according to their Y-DNA signatures and deduce  the sequence in which branching occurred.

Understanding that people’s research interests differ, genetic genealogy test labs offer  marker tests in suites. Our lab offers suites of 12 ($99), 25 ($148), 37($189) and 67($269)  markers (prices as of 2007). An analogy with zip codes helps explain the use of a Y-DNA 12, 25 or 37 marker suite. The first three digits of the zip code, identify a postal region, such as a portion of a state. Similarly the first 12 markers are very stable. They identify a “haplogroup” (a  “clan” – a grouping going back to the ice age). The next 3 digits of a zip code identify the town. In much the same way, near matches in the 25 marker suite (original 12 + 13 more markers, some of which are more volatile) identify a family. Finally the zip + 4 identifies the actual house. Extending to 37 markers distinguishes amongst branches within a family.

If two men differ by more than 1 or 2 counts in the first 12 markers, their common ancestor occurred long before surnames were chosen and there is no way they can be related in the genealogical time frame.

Men who match within 3 marker counts in the 25 marker set are probably related, though the common ancestor may have lived several hundred years ago.

Extending the study to 37 markers allows identification of branching amongst lines that match on all 25 markers and yet know of no common ancestor. There is a 67 marker test providing further differentiation. Only 1 person in our study has used it. He was seeking all the information he could find on his biological father.

Beyond price and identifying the genetic test that best served our genealogical quest, we needed to address issues of safety and privacy because we are using personal material.  The test is a simple, painless, non-invasive cheek swab. The test kit contains two vials with preserving fluid. One collects the cells that have sloughed off from the inside of each cheek during the night with a little plastic rake first thing in the morning.

We chose Family Tree DNA, a company run by scientists with a focus on genetic genealogy. When an order is placed, a numbered kit is mailed to the client. All paperwork connecting client to kit number is stored at one location.  The client maintains control of what is done with the sample and whether the results are shared with anyone. The lab receives, tests and stores the samples, identified only by “kit #”. Unless instructed otherwise, the sample is stored for 25 years, so the client can order further tests without recollecting sample. Each suite of tests contains some control markers that are retested to be sure the retest results are in-synch with the original results.

Family Tree DNA test results have been validated by agreement with results from other labs for the same person’s DNA. Further confirmation occurred when the DNA of a client, who knew his ancestor chose a non-Pidcock name, matched other Pidcocks.

We are quite fortunate that National Geographic has mounted a 5-year study in conjunction with IBM and Family Tree DNA to test people all over the world for haplogroup (“clan”)  and a basic set of 12 very stable markers to understand these migration routes. This means that Family Tree DNA, with 110,908 Y-chromosome DNA records (as of 2007) has a lot of experience in the characterization and rates of mutation of different markers. When one uses this lab, one learns one’s haplogroup automatically. They have developed a prediction tool that compares Y-DNA signatures to predict a probability of time back to most recent common ancestor.  They make it easy for the client, if he chooses, to upload results into a public data base where they can be compared with those of people testing at other labs. Finally, when a new set of markers is offered for analysis, they are chosen based on usefulness in genealogical work.

What have we learned about Pidcock/Pitcocks?

Our first discovery was that some American Pitcocks closely match the DNA signature of our Derbyshire emigrant. We later found American Pidcocks who also matched. One current quest is to understand how the branches represented, evolved. Some of the men in this category, have no idea how they are related to other Pidcocks or Pitcocks. The hope is that by finding others with similar DNA we will be able to form a tree, based on the physical evidence of who is most closely related to whom. Folks on the same branch can share genealogical information.

Our next discovery was a surprise. The original American Pidcock and Pitcock in the study were unrelated even though both had well documented paper trails back to early 17th century Pennsylvania. Through testing descendents of 3 of the 4 sons of Jonathan Pidcock, who relocated from Bucks Co. PA to Lambertville NJ in the 18th century, we see the descendants are clearly related. Furthermore, with so many well documented generations we can see that the Y chromosome replication mechanism is a little more error prone, resulting in a higher mutation rate, in the Bucks Co, PA Pidcock line than the Derbyshire Pitcock-Pidcock line.

About this time a descendant of William Hazelgrove Pidcock, the 19th century Mormon missionary, joined the group. To his initial dismay, his DNA was much different than the first two Pidcock/Pitcock families we had studied. They were both descended from Anglo-Saxons who probably came from Denmark (haplogroups “I1c” for the Derbyshire group and “I1a” for the Bucks Co. PA group). His was “R1b1” indicating Celtic or southern European roots. Since then men descended from 3 of William Hazelgrove Pidcock’s  wives have tested and all have the same DNA signature. This family is now eagerly seeking other Pidcocks especially those with Nottinghamshire roots in hopes of establishing a trans-Atlantic link.

To date we have 1 each of 3 other DNA signatures.

One of these is another English Pidcock. There are several Pidcock lines in Derbyshire, with long genealogies who have been unable to confirm a common ancestor through regular genealogical research. DNA analysis offers another route to recognize biological connection. In this case it shows that tracing one’s roots to Derbyshire, is insufficient proof of family connection (the same situation as we found with early Pennsylvania Pidcocks/Pitcocks).  More genetic data on Pidcock/Pitcock lines with genealogical records going back to Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire will help identify and characterize family units within the our surname.

We have one Pidcoe in the study. Pidcoes believe an early 18th century Pidcock migrating to western Pennsylvania and where the family changed its name. The difficulty is that there are very few male Pidcoes – the only other one we have found, ordered the test kit but did not return it and has not been heard from since. He may have died.

The last Pidcock with no match as yet, is trying to learn anything about his Pidcock roots. In all three of these cases, being the only one with a different DNA signature, one wonders about undocumented paternity (adoption, infidelity). When one finds another Pidcock/Pitcock with the same signature, it stops being a personal issue and becomes a shared research project to understand the family history and evolution.

The more people we have in the study, the better we can characterize the Y-DNA signature and replication rate of each Pidcock/Pitcock family. We can even work backward to postulate the original DNA signature when surnames were selected. With this information, we can help modern day Pidcocks and Pitcocks who would like to reclaim their roots but have no starting place but their own DNA. Along the way, our family has already been asked to aid in a search for identity. One man, whose DNA is similar to the Bucks Co. PA Pidcock line, joined our project while searching for his biological father. He has since learned a name and location for his father and when he finds him, we may find another Pidcock “cousin” and learn another story.

This is fascinating and safe study – our personal mystery. I hope other Pitcocks and Pidcocks will be inspired to join it.

http://www.pidcock-family.org/DNA/DNA.htm


 3 
 on: February 15, 2007, 09:40:12 AM 
Started by Stephen - Last post by Stephen
This is an interesting chart of Pidcock's in the US during the census.

http://www.ancestry.com/learn/facts/fact.aspx?fid=7&ln=Pidcock&fn=

 4 
 on: November 02, 2006, 01:03:59 PM 
Started by Stephen - Last post by Stephen
http://www.rootsweb.com/~engarc/Wills.PDF

 5 
 on: October 26, 2006, 11:47:05 AM 
Started by Stephen - Last post by Stephen
Source:http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/PrinterFriendly.cfm?ArticleId=A0001969

Courtenay
Courtenay, BC, City, pop 18 304 (2001c), 17 404 (1996c), 11 698 (1991cA), area 17.02 km2, inc 1915, is located on the east coast of VANCOUVER ISLAND, 220 km by road north of Victoria. The city is situated on a narrow plain, with mountains to the west rising to 1830 m.

An abundance of fish, game and berries brought a large Comox community to the area (see Northern Georgia Strait COAST SALISH. The first European explorers were Spanish navigators in 1791. Rear-Admiral George William Courtenay of the Royal Navy surveyed the area in 1846-49. A Hudson's Bay Company store was established in the 1850s and non-native settlement began in the 1860s.

A settlement was planned in 1859 and named after the nearby Courtenay River, which in turn had been named for Rear-Admiral Courtenay. Reginald Pidcock, who owned the site and built a mill, and Nova Scotian Joseph McPhee, who started the first store and later bought most of Pidcock's land, helped develop the community. Completion of a road from Victoria in 1910 and the arrival 4 years later of the Esquimalt and Nanaimo Railway spurred Courtenay's growth. Immigration from England, Scotland and the Maritimes followed WWI.

Courtenay has become a service centre for the surrounding fishing, logging and farming region of 35 000 people. CFB Comox and tourism are also important economic features of this region. A special summer attraction is the Courtenay Youth Music Centre, known throughout North America as Canada's summer community of musicians.

Author ALAN F.J. ARTIBISE

The Canadian Encyclopedia © 2006 Historica Foundation of Canada



The following would also make a great source, especial the family tree:

Display - British Columbia Archival Union List (BCAUL)
Provenance:   Pidcock (family)
Title:   Pidcock family fonds
Dates:   1862-1955
Physical desc.:   73 cm of textual records
Bio/Admin History:   The Pidcock family lived in the Comox Valley and Quadra Island, B.C. They were sawmill and cannery operators.
Scope/Content:   The fonds consists of diaries, 4 March 1862 to 16 November 1888, and reminiscences "Adventures in Vancouver Island" (1862) of Reginald Heber Pidcock; diaries May 1902 to March 1955 and Coroner's diary 1954 of George Hugh Pidcock; and a Pidcock family tree, 1669-1955.
Title source:   Title based on the contents of the fonds.
Finding aids:   File list available.
Record No.:   MS-0728
Repository:   British Columbia Archives
Other names:   Pidcock, Reginald Heber ; Pidcock, George Hugh
Names:   Pidcock (family) ; Pidcock, Reginald Heber ; Pidcock, George Hugh

 6 
 on: October 19, 2006, 11:13:04 AM 
Started by Stephen - Last post by Stephen
Source:California Revisited, 1858-1897. Family Tree Legends Records Collection (Online Database). Pearl Street Software, 2004-2005. California Revisited, 1858-1897. By T.S. Kenderdine. Doylestown Publishing Comapany, Doylestown, 1898. "California as I Saw It": First-Person Narratives of California's Early Years, 1849-1900; American Memory, Library of Congress. Page 161 of 325
 

I saw hung on the walls two "Bear Flags;" the colors of California before a part of the Union. One was flung to the breeze at Sonoma in 1846, and did duty again the past year at the fiftieth anniversary of that event. I also saw something which in that far off land forcibly struck me. In the list of troops offered the Governor of Pennsylvania for service in the Mexican war, framed on the side of the museum, were two companies of Bucks County soldiers. These were the Union Guards, 74 men, Jas. Morrison, Captain; J. G. Hill, 1st Lieutenant, and Jont. J. Morrison, 2d Lieutenant, and the Doyles-town Guards, 77 men, Charles H. Mann, Captain; J. S. Bryan, 1st Lieutenant, and John Pidcock, 2d Lieutenant. Alone, a stranger in a strange land, these echoes of a local past produced a thrill which can be understood by those who have been similarly affected.



 7 
 on: October 19, 2006, 10:57:16 AM 
Started by Stephen - Last post by Stephen
Source: Lord Byron, Letters and Journals, Volume 2, 1811-1814. Family Tree Legends Records Collection (Online Database). Pearl Street Software, 2004-2005. The Works of Lord Byron: Letters and Journals, Volume 2.. Byron, Lord. Page 267 and 268 of 608

For the best part of two years Hunt was Byron's guest: he repaid his hospitality by publishing his 'Lord Byron and Some of his
Contemporaries' (1828). Though Lady Blessington said the book "gave, in the main, a fair account" of Byron (Crabb Robinson's 'Diary', vol. iii.p. 13), its publication was a breach of honour. As such it was justly attacked by Moore in "The 'Living Dog' and the 'Dead Lion'":

week will be published (as 'Lives' are the rage)
The whole Reminiscences, wondrous and strange,
Of a small puppy-dog, that lived once in the cage
Of the late noble Lion at Exeter 'Change.

"Though the dog is a dog of the kind they call 'sad,'
'Tis a puppy that much to good breeding pretends;
And few dogs have such opportunities had
Of knowing how Lions behave--among friends.

"How that animal eats, how he snores, how he drinks,
Is all noted down by this Boswell so small;
And 'tis plain, from each sentence, the puppy-dog thinks
That the Lion was no such great things after all.

"Though he roared pretty well--this the puppy allows--
It was all, he says, borrowed--all second-hand roar;
And he vastly prefers his own little bow-wows
To the loftiest war-note the Lion could pour.

"'Tis, indeed, as good fun as a 'Cynic' could ask,
To see how this cockney-bred setter of rabbits
Takes gravely the Lord of the Forest to task,
And judges of Lions by puppy-dog habits.

"Nay, fed as he was (and this makes it a dark case)
With sops every day from the Lion's own pan,
He lifts up his leg at the noble beast's carcass,
And--does all a dog, so diminutive, can.

"However, the book's a good book, being rich in
Examples and warnings to lions high-bred,
How they suffer small mongrelly curs in their kitchen,
Who'll feed on them living, and foul them when dead.

"Exeter 'Change'.

T. PIDCOCK."

 8 
 on: October 18, 2006, 06:23:20 PM 
Started by Stephen - Last post by Stephen
http://www.offalyhistory.com/content/reading_resources/archaeology/glass_furnaces.htm

Forest Glass Furnaces in County Offaly

In this article Caimin O'Brien and Jean Farrelly focus on the archaeological and documentary evidence for the glass industry in seventeenth-century Offaly.

At the beginning of the seventeenth century the method of manufacturing glass in northern Europe had not changed since the Middle Ages. However, by the end of the century the advances in the glass industry had made the earlier technology obsolete. The main evidence for the manufacture of glass in this period comes from medieval documentary sources because the survival rate of glass-furnaces is very poor. In England there is no surviving upstanding forest glass wood-fired furnace of the sixteenth-seventeenth-century period, and several which have been excavated only survived to a few courses high. The discovery of an extant furnace with barrel-vaulted roof in situ in the town land of Glasshouse near the village of Shinrone in County Offaly offers the archaeologist a rare opportunity to examine the technology of an often-forgotten glass industry.

Two locational factors were necessary for establishing a glass-furnace: firstly, close proximity to woodlands where there was an abundant supply of fuel and ash from the burning process; secondly, a convenient source of sand, e.g. an esker ridge. The furnaces themselves were simple rubble-stone structures consisting of a barrel-vaulted firing chamber with a central fire-trench. The fire was fed from either one or both sides of the chamber via a stoking tunnel. The crucibles were placed in pairs on top of the sieges, which were located on either side of the fire-trench. Work holes (glory holes) were built into the side of the vault to allow the glass-makers to remove impurities which rise to the surface of the molten glass and also to check when the glass was ready for working. An iron pole was inserted into the crucible via the work hole, if the molten glass was ready a thread of glass would hang from the rod.

The resulting glass was green because of potassium oxide specifically found in wood, and was known as forest glass. Dry wood, producing little smoke, was essential as there no chimney to allow smoke to escape in the furnace. Moreover, it has the additional benefit of reaching higher temperatures. The furnace itself was enclosed by a wooden building or glasshouse, some examples of which were known to have been roofed with wooden shingles or slate. The post-holes or ditches of these buildings have been identified in excavations of forest furnaces in England.

Until the mid-sixteenth century the glass industry in England and Ireland was virtually non-existent, glass being imported from France. As an example of how precious glass was at that time, it is recommended that "when Duke of Northumberland left Alnwick castle the steward was accustomed to take out the glazed windows and stow them away safely until the Duke's return". In 1567 a Huguenot, Jean Carre, obtained a permit from Queen Elizabeth I to establish a forest glass industry in the Sussex/Surrey region. The workforce was recruited from experienced glass-making families centered in the Lorraine region. Among those recruited were the Hennezells (Henseys) and the de Bigaults/Bigots (Bigos).

In 1586 Queen Elizabeth I granted Captain Woodhouse suit for a privilege to make glass in Ireland. His assistance to George Longe and Ralph Pillying in erecting and maintaining two houses for glass making'. This was followed by the granting of a monopoly in 1589. In October 1589, a petition from George Longe to Lord Burghley stated that 'he has spent his time wholly in the trade and has found stuffe meet and brought to perfection the making of glass in Ireland'. Longe had bought the patent for glass-making from Captain Woodhouse in that same year. There are also references to land being granted to Philip de Bigo in County Offaly during the Elizabethan period.

By the early seventeenth century English manufacturers had developed coal-fired furnaces based in towns which were beginning to replace the wood-fired furnaces. An Englishman, Admiral Sir Robert Mansell, held the monopoly on this new technology. Furthermore, owing to the enormous depletion of woodland a royal proclamation in 1615 banned the use of wood fuel in glasshouses in England. The increased competition of Mansell, who also ensured the strict enforcement of the 1615 ban, pushed the French families out of the glass-making industry. In order to ply their trade, some of these French families moved to other countries which were not prohibited from using wood, Ireland included.

In 1619 Mansell issued an arrest for Sir William Clavell and Abraham Bigo. This may have been as a result of Clavell and Bigo's joint venture to establish a glasshouse at Church Knowle in Dorset in 1618. Four years later, in 1623, Abraham Bigo appears in Birr, Co. Offaly, having leased land from Lawrence Parsons to construct a glasshouse in the townland of Clonbrone, near Birr. Under the conditions of this lease Bigo could not 'set up any glass house or glasswork on any other land, or buy wood of any other for his glasswork but only of me'. In the reign of Charles II (1660-85) a namesake and descendant of the earlier Philip Bigo was granted land in Ballyneshragh, Carrowmore, Feddane and Newtown in Lusmagh, Co. Offaly, and according to local tradition he established some glasshouses in these areas.

In 1638/9 the exportation and manufacture of glass in Ireland was prohibited, and in 1641 another bill prohibited the felling of trees as a fuel supply for glass-furnaces. As happened in England twenty years earlier, the combined effects of the legislation and technological advances heralded the end of the forest glass wood-fired furnaces.

The Henseys are mentioned in Ireland in the seventeenth century in Garrycastle and Banagher in the parish of Lusmagh; Kilorney, Ballyengowne, Galrus, Ballyshane in Rynagh parish; Bollinure, Ballinkellin in Shinrone parish and Clonlisk, Ballintoren, Adrowle, Kellogs in the parish of Kilcommon, Co. Offaly. On the current edition of Ordnance Survey map the latter three townlands surround the Glasshouse site, which suggests that the furnace was associated with the Hensey family. In 1670 one Ananias Hensey set up a glasshouse near the new town of Portarlington, which was founded in 1666. The Calendar of State Papers for November 1670 states that Hensey was 'failing in his art of making glass' despite the fact that he had 'practiced it in another place these twenty years past'. Perhaps Hensey was trying by trial and error to make the transition from the old wood-fired furnace to the more efficient new technology of the coal-fired furnace. The site of this glasshouse may have been located at the 'Glasshouse' marked on the Ordnance Survey map west of the town.

In England the majority of glasshouse sites have been identified by the field-name Glasshouse, and of those identified only the lower portions of the furnaces survive. Two townlands in County Offaly are called Glasshouse. The earliest reference to the townland name of Glasshouse at Shinrone was made in 1717, which suggests that the townland received its name in the seventeenth century. Townland, close to the village of Shinrone, was found, after field inspection, to contain the upstanding remains of a seventeenth-century glass furnace. This is a typical barrel-vaulted crude sandstone structure with a central fire-trench and opposing stoking tunnels. The entire internal surface of the vaulted furnace is covered in a layer of blue/green glass. There are two work holes on one side wall at the springing level of the arch, and evidence of two destroyed holes on the opposite wall. The siege platforms are in place but the end walls do not survive.

The plan and section of this furnace correspond well with a mid-sixteenth-century forest glass-furnace at Blunden's Wood, Surrey, England (see section), and a seventeenth-century example at Jamestown, Virgina, America, dated to 1608. A large fragment of another glass-furnace with similar glass-covered surface was recovered from a field wall, along with fragments of glass, in the townland of Glaster, near Lusmagh. This site is associated with Philip Bigo in the 1659 census. The furnace at Glasshouse, Shinrone, is likely to fall within the date range 1590 - 1640, based on parallels with the above-mentioned furnaces. After the 1640s the wood-fired -furnaces were replaced by the technologically advanced, town-based, coal-fired furnaces. From the Elizabethan period up to the 1659 census both the Bigo and Hensey families were known to be living and plying their trade throughout County Offaly.
Acknowledgements:
We would like to express our thanks to the following people who generously gave their time and assistance in the preparation if this article: Mary Boydell, Annette Camier, Hon. Sec. of the Huguenot Society of Ireland, David Crossley, Sheffield University and Noel McMahon, Shinrone.

 9 
 on: October 16, 2006, 11:18:17 AM 
Started by Stephen - Last post by Stephen
This book will be a must read and I will hunt for it at local libraries.

Collections for a genealogy of the noble families of Henzey, Tyttery,
and Tyzack (De Hennezel, De Thiétry, and Du Thisac) : "ge
   
About this book
 
Source: Original data: Grazebrook, H. Sydney. Collections for a genealogy of the noble families of Henzey, Tyttery, and Tyzack (De Hennezel, De Thiétry, and Du Thisac) : "gentilshommes verriers" from Lorraine : with a narrative pedigree of the Stourbridge branch of the first-named family and its descendants, including the several families of Brettell, Bate, Dixon, Hill, Jeston, Jervis, Pidcock and others. Index  Back matter  Window-glass  Introduction of the manufacture of glass into Worcestershire and Staffordshire  Glass-making in England  Jeston Family  Abstracts of wills and administrations of the family of Jeston  The family of Jeston  Wills and administrations of the family of Tyzack  Abstracts of wills and administrations of the family of Henzey  Henzey, Tyttery, and Tyzack families  Genealogy of the family of Hennezel of Lorriane, &c.  Pedigree of the family of Pidcock  Genealogical account of the descendants of Joshua Henzey, of Amblecote, glass maker and gentleman, who died in 1660  The Henzey, Tyttery, and Tyzack families  Front matter  Title page. Stourbridge England: Printed for the author by J.T. Ford, 1877.
 
Notes:      Erratum slip inserted at t.p.
Includes index.
 
Subjects:      Henzey family.
Tyttery family.
Tyzack family.
De Hennezel family
De Thietry family
De Thisac family

 10 
 on: October 13, 2006, 04:58:11 PM 
Started by Stephen - Last post by Stephen
In some of Sylvanus Urban's Gentleman's Magazine, 1800 century journals, the subject turns  tothe famous Huguenot french glassmakers who moved from France. This is relevant to Pidcock geneolgy as our paternal line married into the Henzey family.

I will explore those relationships to uncover any sources. Some of the orginal scanned volumns of Gentleman's Magazine were translated into text and I highlight in red information which is pertinent.

The original source:
http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/ilej/
A translation source:
http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/h/e/n/Barry-M-Henzell/FILE/0004page.html?Welcome=985987053


MIGRATION FRANCE TO ENGLAND GLASSMAKERS ON THE MOVE 2

CORRESPONDENCE OF SYLVANUS URBAN 4

GENTLEMAN'S MAGAZINE - VOL. XLVI NOV. 1856PAGES 592-3 4

GENTLEMAN'S MAGAZINE - VOL. XLVI DEC 1856 PAGES 728-9. 6

GENTLEMAN'S MAGAZINE - VOL.XLVII JAN 1857 PAGES 73-4. 7

GENTLEMAN'S MAGAZINE - VOL XLII 1853 PAGE 508 9


GLASSMAKERS ON THE MOVE

During and after the Renaissance the old family patterns in glassmaking began to break up for several reasons. Printed books began to appear, which revealed technological knowledge in detail, and many of the secrets that for centuries have been family secrets were now available to all that could read.[1] Because of the expansion of glassmaking during the sixteenth century glassmakers were in great demand. Agents lured glassmakers to work for them, tempted by monetary rewards, the wish for adventure and the desire to break away from the close family circle. Their special skills were recognized and they could improve their social standing. Fear of religious persecution, heightened by the massacre of St Bartholomew in 1572, and the "Spanish fury" in Antwerp in 1576, when troops sacked the city and massacred hundreds of Protestants which explains the migration to England.[2]

 

It is known that during the sixteenth century glassmakers from the Continent began to establish themselves in England. During the third quarter of the sixteenth century Jean Carré encouraged glassmaking families from the Lorraine district of France to come to England. Carré offered the Lorrainers a nine‑year contract and it was this, not the shortage of fuel as previously, that prompted them to move to England in 1568. Protestant families of whom the best known names are Hennezal, Thiétry, Thisac and du Houx. The de Houx (Dehowe) family has been traced to Rye, Sussex, in 1571, and Wilsborough Green in the Weald three years later.[3]

 

Wealden glass began to deteriorate by the middle of the sixteenth century. Venetian and Lorraine glass‑workers saw an opportunity to set themselves up and capture the market for themselves. The Venetian adventure was short lived and most returned to Italy.[4] The Lorraine workers had greater success, due largely to the genius of Jean Carré. He was a native of Arras and a man gifted artistically and endowed with strength of mind and force of character. He was responsible for the revival of the manufacture of window glass and fine crystal tableware into Elizabethan England. After arriving in England in 1567, he immediately built three furnaces, one in London and two in the Weald near the Surrey‑Sussex border and he had acquired a monopoly for the manufacture of window glass.[5]

 

Carré organised a "fellowship" or company to finance window‑glass making in the Weald and crystal‑glass making in London. Imported capital was used from glassmakers themselves and others. Carré had a half interest and his son‑in‑law Peter Appel contributed. Peter Briet who came from the low countries about the same time as Carré contributed capital and assisted with management and marketing. The fourth member of the company was Jean Chevalier, chastelain of the castle of Fontenoy in Lorraine. He probably never came to England but was related to the glassmaking family of the de Hennezells and may even been its head. "Chevallier" was the title and rank of the de Hennezel family. It was probably not his surname that may have been omitted from the English translation of the contract.[6] Carré bought several Muranese workers to London to make cristallo glass vessels. This work prospered for over a hundred years. In the Weald, Carré established four different families for window glassmaking. These were Enzell, Tysack, Tittery and Hoe, all of whom had earned privilege from the King of France. The Henzell family settled at Alfold, Surrey.[7] They belonged to "les gentilshommes verriers" but Robertson states that Carré's gentilshommes displayed only the worst attributes of nobility, encumbered by any of the finer qualities. They were proud but lacked good manners, impulsive but without grace, qualities that did not commend them to those with whom they worked.

 

Carré's dealings with the established glassmakers in the Weald might be described as unscrupulous which caused a deal of resentment. Upon his death in May 1572 a revolt by those he had overreached and outwitted ensued. His Lorraine workers were the scapegoats. The old‑established glassmakers of the Weald joined with the ironworkers, who were indignant at the inroads made by the Lorrainers into the available stock of fuel. This was the pot calling the kettle black, for when it came to cutting down whole forests to supply billets for their smelting furnaces the ironworkers had no equal. Nevertheless, the Lorrainers used considerable quantities of fuel, and when their glasshouses were closed there would be all the more wood for the ironworkers.  It was therefore to the advantage of the ironworkers to join forces with the old established glassmakers in clearing out those unconscionable destroyers of good trees, the Lorraine glass‑workers.

 

Another factor that made them unpopular with the ironworkers was that they were over‑jealous of their secret techniques, and despite the contrary terms of the contract to which they had subscribed their outlandish names, they would not teach Englishmen their trade.

 

Things were made so hot for the Lorrainers that in two years most of them had left the district. Guttery states that despite the unjustness of the treatment, including arson and threats of murder, the Lorrainers fulfilled their contract but left soon after. Only a few Henzeys remained until 1610.  In the end it was to their advantage for the Lorrainers and the country for glassmaking was established throughout the land, in Buckholt, Hampshire, Stourbridge, in Cheswardine, and Newcastle‑on‑Tyne.

 

The year 1615 was historic for English glassmaking. A Royal Proclamation forced the use of pit‑coal, in lieu of the diminishing supplies of timber. The proclamation forbad the importation of foreign glass, thus giving a boost to the local industry. Sir Robert Mansell took up the challenge in that year and began to organize glassmaking on a national scale.[8] Massell's manager James Howell helped the Lorrainers to move to the coalfields, some to Nottingham, some to Newcastle‑on‑Tyne and others to the Stoubridge district. The Nottingham venture did not last but in the two other districts the Henzeys took the lead. The Stoubridge families seem to have taken the name Henzey or even Ensell. European languages pronounce Henzell with a silent "H". The Newcastle branch used Henzell, both being derived from the original de Hennezel.

 

Guttery's book "From Broad‑glass to Cut Crystal", gives the history of the Stoubridge glass industry. It is available on request from the Queensland Public Library.

 

It may be of interest at this stage to reproduce, in full, published magazine articles written in the 1850's. The first titled "An Historical Review of the Ancient Families of Henzell, Tyttery and Tyzack".

 

 
        CORRESPONDENCE OF SYLVANUS URBAN

 
        GENTLEMAN'S MAGAZINE - VOL. XLVI NOV. 1856PAGES 592-3

 

MR. URBAN,

Towards the end of the sixteenth century, Thomas de Henzell and Balthazar de Henzell, dwelling at the Vosges, in the county of Lorraine, with their relatives, ‑ Tyttery and ‑ Tyzack, all Huguenots, being driven from their native country in a religious persecution, emigrated to England; one of the Henzells settling at Newcastle‑on‑Tyne, and the others in the counties of Woechester and Stafford, where they formed an encampment at the Lye, near Stourbridge, in the former county, on a spot called "Hungary‑hill". Finding that this superior kind of clay which exists in the neighborhood very nearly resembled that used in their native country in the making of pots for glass, they erected a glasshouse here, and were probably the first introducers of the broad or window‑glass manufacture into England.

 

The Henzeys (as the name was afterwards spelt) are represented by the Pidcocks of the Platts, (who for several generations carried on the glass trade), the Brettells of Finstall‑house, near Bromsgrove, and the Dixons, formerly of Dixons‑green, Dudley: - by the Pidcocks, through the marriage of Wm. Pidcock with Elizabeth, daughter of Thomas Henzey, esq., who died in 1712; by the Brettells[9] through the marriage, in 1748, of Thomas Brettell[10], esq., of Stourbridge, (afterwards of Finstall‑house), with Sarah Henzey, of Broseley, (with the consent of Susanna Barrett, of Broseley, widow); and by the Dixons, through the marriage of Jonathan Dixon[11], of Kidderminster, with Mary Henzey, in 1737.

 

The name Henzey probably still exists in Staffordshire, under the altered form of Ensell[12], and it still extant in its original form on the banks of the Tyne: a member of it, George Harle Henzell, figured very conspicuously last year as a witness in the Burdon poisoning case.

 

The Tyttery family was represented in the last century by the Rev. Mr. Saunders of Shenstone, Staffordshire, and his brothers, one of whom was an apothecary at Stourbridge, and another followed the said profession at Dudley.

 

The only trace of the Tyzacs I can find is that a "Waldron Hill, Kingswinford, Staffordshire, gentleman," was married, in the year 1746, to Elizabeth Tyzack, widow by whom he had issue John Hill, of Coleborne Brook, a glassmanufacturer, father of the Rev. Edw. Hill. I enclose a sketch of the Henzey arms[13], and shall be obliged to any of your correspondents who can explain the singular crest, which I take to be a "bar shot" surmounted of a "pellet".

 

My reason for troubling you with all this above is to ascertain, ‑

1. The paternity of Sarah and Mary Henzey, who married respectively Brettells and Dixon. Were they sisters?

 

2. Who was "Susanna Barrett, of Broseley, widow?"

 

3. What were the armorial bearings of the families of Tyttery and Tyzac? and who are the representatives of the latter family?

 

4. What are the armorial bearings of Brettell, who have always borne those of Henzey[14], differenced by a marlet?

 

                                             H.S.G.

 
          GENTLEMAN'S MAGAZINE - VOL. XLVI DEC 1856 PAGES 728-9.

 

MR. URBAN,

In your last letter there is an interesting letter regarding the Henzey, Tyttery and Tyzac families, and the introduction by them into this country of the manufacture of glass.

 

The early history of these families, particularly of the Henzey family, is given in Cheyaye Desbois's "Dictionary of the Nobles of France," at pp. 25‑31 of the second edition, vol. viii, published in 1774.

 

From this it appears that the French name of the family which we know as Henzey, Henzell, and Ensell, is De Hennezel, that it was originally a noble Bohemian family, and that the principal branch of it settled in the Lorraine about four centuries prior to the publication of Desbois's Dictionary. From that time, remarks the author, its members have occupied positions of the greatest importance in Lorraine, and have contracted alliances with families of old nobility. Several branches established themselves in Switzerland, Hainault, Franche‑Comte, Nivernois, Champagne, and other provinces of France. He adds, that the family constantly maintained the lustre of its name by great alliances, by the possession of fiefs and military dignities.

 

Such is, I believe, a fair version of Desbois's introductory notice of the De Hennezel family; but I subjoin the following extract for such as may wish to peruse the original work itself:‑

 

HENZELL.‑"Noblesse originaire du Royaume de Bohême, dont la    principale est etablie en Lorraine depuis environs quatre siècles. Elle ya joui, dés ce tems la, des distinctions des premieres de la Province, s'y est alliée avecles mansions de l'ancienne, et ya assisée aux assizes.

 

Plusieurs branches sont actuellemont repandues en Suisse, en Hainaut, en Franche‑Comté, en Nivernois, en Champagne, et autres provinces du Royaume. Elle s'est partout constamment maintenne dans son lustre par les grandes alliances, la possession des fiefs et les dignitiés militaries."

 

1.The first of the family of whom any record is given by Desbois, is Henri Hennezel, who married Isabeau d'Esche, 30th May, 1392.

 

2. Henri de Hennezel, who was maitre d'hotel to Charles, Duke of Lorraine.

 

3. Jean de Hennezel, who married Damoiselle Beatrix de Barizey, in 1446.

 

4. Didier de Hennezel, a captain in the army of Antoine, Duke of Lorraine, married Marie Anne de Thiétry. This name de Thiétry, is the French mode of writing Tyttery. Several other members of the De Hennezel family formed matrimonial connections with the De Thiétry family. Thus José de Hennezel, in 1615, married Marthe de Thiétry; and, in 1650 Claude Francois married Elizabeth de Thiétry. I could cite many more instances.

 

The seventh, of whom there is any record Thiébault de Hennezel, styled a gentleman‑in‑waiting on Henri, duc de Lorraine, married Damoiselle Louise du Thisac, 16th April,1600. In 1535, Catherine, daughter of Nicholas Hennezel by Marie Anne de Thiétry, married Charles du Thisac; and in 1539, Nicole de Hennezel married Jean du Thisac. This name is the original French mode of writing Tyzack.

 

The marriages between the three families of De Hennezel, de Thiétry and du Thisac were numerous. This family connection doubtless induced them to emigrate together, and it is well known that they constantly intermarried long after their settlement in England.

 

The arms of the De Hennezel family as given by Desbois, and published in the Armorial Universelle in Paris, are the same as those borne by them in this country, viz.‑

 

"De gueules, à 3 glands montans d'argent, poseés 2 and 1". "Supports, duex lions au naturel."

 

I do not know when glass was first manufactured in France; but may not the De Hennezels have been instrumental in introducing it from Bohemia, their native country?

 

The exercise of this art was held to be in no way derogatory to the dignity of the nobility, and those who practised it were styled: Gentilshommes Verriers," (vide Felice's "History of the Protestants of France", p.428.)

 

The De Hennezels and their connections the De Thiétry and the Du Thisacs were Huguenots, and were driven to this country probably by the first persecution, and bought with them the art of making window‑glass. They first came to London, and then removed, some to Newcastle‑on‑Tyne, but the greater number to Coalbournebrook and Amblecote, in the parish of Oldswinford, co. Stafford, where they established the manufacture of glass. It afterwards greatly extended in the hands of their successors, both on the male and female side, and has for many generations formed one of the staple manufacturers of the district.

 

About three years since Mr. Richardson read to the Society of Antiquaries at Newcastle an interesting paper regarding the introduction to that town of the manufacture of glass by the De Hennezel family and their connections, and an engagement entered into by the former in 1568 to make glass was then produced.

 

The entries of the births, deaths, and marriages, under the name of Henzey, in the Oldswinford parish register, are very numerous, and commence with Dec. 7, 1615. Parish registers go no further back than 1602.

 

Perhaps some of your readers may be able to give  the origin of the village "Pillerton Henzey" in Warwickshire, in connection with this family, and also whether the Irish family of Hennessey is a branch of the same. This is not improbable, as I find that Annanias Henzey, son of Ambercote, who died in 1660, and Katherine his wife, lived at Gragnefine, King's County, Ireland.

 

                                             ANTIQUARIAN.

 

 
          GENTLEMAN'S MAGAZINE - VOL.XLVII JAN 1857 PAGES 73-4.

 

 

MR. URBAN,

In your last issue you were pleased to insert my account of the early history of the Henzey, Tyttery, and Tyzack families, and of their introduction by them of the broad or window‑glass manufacture from France into this country.

 

With your permission, I will now proceed to reply, as far as I am able, to the questions suggested by your correspondent H. S. G., in your November number.

 

Firstly in regard to the singular crest of the Henzey or De Hennezel family, referred to by your correspondent. The following description of their arms, which is appointed to them, clearly shews that the crest be composed of a fire‑bolt and fire‑ball.

 

        "This is the true Coate of Armes, with Mantle, Helmet and Crest, pertaininge to the famely of Mr. Joshua Henzell, of Bamblecott in the County of Stafford, Gentleman, who was the Sonne of Annanias Henzell de la Mansion de Henzell tout pré la village de Darnell, en la Pie de Lorraine. Which Armes of his Auncestours were there sett upp in the Duke of Lorraine's Gallery windowe, amongst many other Noblemen's Coates of Armes, there aneald in glasse, Being thus blared; Henzell on a ffeild gules beareth Three acornes slipped or; Two and one; Eusigned with a Helmett propper. Thereon a wreath, or and Gules; a ffire‑boulte andffire‑ball; or; Mantled Gules; Lyued argent; and Tasselled and Buttoned, or."

 

The Darnell here referred to as the residence of the Henzell family, is doubtless Darneuille in the Departement des Vosges, in Lorraine.

 

The Henzey family, on emigrating from France, appear to have  made a slight difference to their arms for the sake of distinction, the acorns according to Chenaye Desbois being argent, and according to the above description or.

 

In reply to your correspondent's query regarding Sarah and Mary Henzey, who married respectively Brettell and Dixon, I am of the opinion that they were sisters, for I find that John Henzey had by his wife, née White, three daughters, Frances, Mary and Sarah, and that Mary was married to Jonathan Dixon.

I may add that the Brettell family was of French origin, and that its history is given by Desbois under the name of De Breteuille. This family intermarried frequently with the Henzeys in England. Thus it appears from the Old Swinford parish register, that on the 15th of September, 1617, John Brettell married Mary Henzye, and the Joshua  referred to in the coat of arms married Joan Brettell, who died in 1671.

 

Your correspondent asks, Who was Susannah Barrett? She was the third child of Mr. John Jesson of Hagley, and married Francis Barrett at Broseley. Her son went to Madeira, and there inherited Mr, Pope's fortune of between 30 and 40,000l. He left it to his mother, Susannah Barrett, who bequeathed it to Mr. Richard Case of Worchester; he was the grandson of her brother, Richard Jesson.

 

I do not know what the armorial bearings of the families of Tyttery and Tyzack are, or where are the representatives of the latter family, but I think the name is to be found in the "London Directory."

 

                                             ANTIQUARIAN

 

 

 

 

 
          GENTLEMAN'S MAGAZINE - VOL XLII 1853 PAGE 508

 

SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF NEWCASTLE-ON-TYNE.

 

Oct.5th. At the monthly meeting Dr. Charlton exhibited a variety of fragments, gathered at Benwell, the Condercum of the Romans, in digging the foundations of a house for Mr. Mulcaster. There were several old coins, pieces of Samian ware, fragments of weapons of war and a number of distaff‑rings, one of them particularly handsome; also a hammer head of stone, the implement of more ancient occupiers of British soil than the Romans.

 

Mr. George Bouchier Richardson read his collections on the introduction of the glass manufacture on the Tyne. Having devoted a few pages to the origin and general history of the manufacture of glass, he then discussed the local particulars, commencing with a payment of 11s6d.(11/6) in 1554 "for a cradle of glass" for the Merchants Court of Newcastle. In 1585, William Huntley, Newcastle merchant, imported "one chest of glass" by the Fortune, of Accarstott; and Henry Chapmen nine chests by the Falcon of London. In May, 1594, the Corporation paid 32s9d. "for a chest of glass for mending the glass windows in Saint Nicholus churche so far as the steeple reachethe." In this century the manufacture was introduced into England, and Mr. Richardson cited from the Lansdown MSS. three important documents respecting it. The first is a paper in French, "done at Windsore the IX of August 1567, " by Antione Becque (alias Dolin) and John Quarre.

 

They had heard by Monsieur Nichayson that Lord Burchley had hinted to her Majesty concerning their matter, and that she was agreeable thereto and was satisfied with a toll. His lordship should have their "never‑ejding thanks" and the more substantial reward, for life, of "The halfpenny of every tenpence that they should sell." In 1568, an undertaking was entered into by Thomas and Balthazar de Hennezes, esquire, dwelling at the glass‑houses in the Vosges, in the countie of Lorraine, and John Chevallier, chatelain and receyvour of Fonteney le Chastelle, which reefers to the privilege already obtained by "John Quarre of Antwerp, and this present resident in London" in his own name and that of Chevallier", to make and builde in England ovens to make great glass, " and then relates that the two Hennezes had agreed to transport themselves to England to build two ovens, and bring with them four "gentlemen glasiers, that is to saye, two terrieurs and two gatherers,: receiving two hundred crowns a year and dividing the surplus profit, the partnership to endure for nine years. The third document is a petition addressed to Lord Burghley by one George Longe, in or about 1589, in which the patent of Anthony Dollyne and John Carye(Quarre), merchants of the Low Countries, grantes in Sept. 9 Eliz. for twenty‑one years, is again referred to, but which is stated to have become void about six years after the grant, from nonperformance of covenants, whereupon other men erected and set on work divers glass‑houses in sundry parts of the realm. "About vij. years past, " Longe reminds the Lord Treasurer, "your Honour called them that kept the glass‑houses before you, to know who should pay the Queen's custom; whose answer generally was, that there was no custom due but by conditions of a special privilege which no of them did enjoy and they were nit bound to pay custom for commodities made within the realm. Thus (continued Longe) hath her Majesty been deceived, and still will be, without reformation (be had)." Upon these arguments Long proceeds to beg the monopoly for himself, promising to erect only glass‑houses in England, where he states there were then fifteen but others that might be required in Ireland. By this scheme, "the superfluous woods of Ireland wastes, ‑ that which, in time a rebellion, her Majesty hath no greater enemy there. The country will be much strengthened, for every glass‑house will be so good as twenty men in a garrison; and the country will be sooner brought to civility, for many poor folk will be set on work". For this he promised a double custom to her Majesty, to keep Lord Burghley's buildings in repair with the best glass, and to bestow one hundred angles at her honour's appointment. Mr. Richardson was constrained to confess that "we have only the slenderest circumstantial evidence to induce a belief that the manufacturer of glass was established on the Tyne before the coming of James," but still he was inclined to credit the assertion of Bourne, the Newcastle historian, that the Henzells, Tyzacs, and Tytorys, Protestants from Lorraine, established glassworks on the Tyne at Newcastle in the reign of Elizabeth. It was conjectured that the Henzells descended from the brothers De Hennezes, but this appears to require confirmation.

 

At the close of the instructive paper, it was suggested that there might be leases in possession of the corporation which would throw light on the question. Mr. Clayton, the town clerk, said that the general Leven and other ravagers had despoiled Newcastle of her records; but if, amongst those remaining, there were any which could be of assistance to Mr. Richardson in his researches, they were at his service. The paper was a very good one as it stood, but he thought Mr. Richardson might extend it with advantage. ‑Mr. Richardson thanked the town clerk for his liberal offer, and said he would avail himself of it.

 

CUTTING FROM NEWSPAPER[15]

 

In addition to the contributions in glass alluded to, we find a number of Vases of various forms, skillfully made, and well painted in enamel colors, contributed by Mr. George Ensall, glassmanufacturer, Upper Priory. These in themselves deserve something more than a passing notice, associated as they are with  the interesting fact that to the family, of which this contributor is a descendant, is due the introduction of the glass manufacture to this district and town; the story is an interesting one, and is worthy of being more generally known, we therefore make no apology for presenting it to the consideration of our readers.

 

The introduction of the art of glassmaking and working we owe to the mistaken zeal and virulent spirit displayed by those in power against certain opinions held by the inhabitants of the kingdom of Hungary and the province of Lorraine. In matters of a civil and religious kind, opposition naturally gives rise to dissension, which in the end operated to the detriment of the country whose rulers exhibit intolerance. In this instance, banding themselves together, many of the inhabitants left the land of their nativity and carried with them those arts which they practised with such unrivalled skill. Among those who fled from the civil commotions which threatened to overthrow the institutions of their country in 1555 or 1556, was a company headed by an individual by the name of Henzoll, a name which has since been corrupted into that of Henzer, Henzey, and finally now, Ensall. To these we owe the introduction of the glass manufacture at Stourbridge. Some of their descendants are still residents in the vicinity of the town. The family was connected with that of the then Duke of Lorraine, and the armorial bearings it is still possible to trace emblazoned on the windows of the palace which once owned them as masters. It may afford some ground for doubt to the probability of a trained band of soldiers and their leaders, as not a few of the band , headed by Henzoll, were (responsible for) introducing the art of glassmaking. The peculiar operation of the Conscript Act, which was then more stringent than at a later period, will readily account for so many of the military being acquainted with handicrafts, the art of glass blowing among the number. The company alluded to supported them‑selves in their wanderings by their knowledge and practical skill in music. Their leader was an exquisite performer on the violin; the instrument we are told, is still in possession of the family. Trusting to this slender and precarious source as a means of existence, and not meeting that support in London which they anticipated, a "tour in the provinces" seemed the only legitimate course of procedure left by which to eke out a bare life. Leaving the Metropolis, chance alone directing their steps, they found their way into the midland counties, and there, in one of the inhospitable districts, viz., Lye Waste, formed their encampment. Casting their eyes about, the wanderers observed with no small degree of pleasure, evidences of the existence of the invaluable fire clay, out of which, in their own country, they had formed the glass and melting pots. The precise place upon which the strangers took up their permanent abode, and where the first glass‑house was erected, is still known by the name of Hungary Hill. To the existence of this clay, then may be safely be attributed the localising of glass making as manufacture of the district. The other materials which were wanted, with the exception of coal, are only to be procured at a distance; the sand in use being obtained from Norfolk or the western coast of the Isle of Wight. Good sand is also procured from America.

 

The articles reproduced above give some understanding of the emigration of the Henzell family to England. The Henzell family now settled in Australia, particularly those living in Queensland, and descended from the four sons of John Harrop Henzell who migrated to Australia in the 1860's, are descended from the family of Henzells from Newcastle‑upon‑Tyne.

 

A detailed family tree of that family has been compiled from the parish register of All Saints and St. Nicholas churches in Newcastle. As yet it has not been possible to connect John Harrop Henzell mentioned above to that family, but as he was born in 1812 at Boldon, a few miles from Newcastle it is reasonable to assume that he would be related.

 

The family tree starts with Isaac Henza or Henzell who was born probably about 1620 and may have been:‑

 

(1) a descendant of the Henzeys who settled first in Sussex and  subsequently in Newcastle about 1618, or

 

(2) the son of a de Hennezel who emigrated to Newcastle from Lorraine.

 

In support of the latter supposition it is interesting to note that one, Gabriel Henzell, son of an Isaac Henzell (or "Henley a Frenchman") was baptised at St. Nicholas (Newcastle) in 1618, his parents having landed at Newcastle three days prior before Gabriel's birth. Isaac Henza may have been another child of that emigrant. It is unlikely that Isaac had any direct connection with the Henzeys who settled in Staffordshire.

 

There are other reports from Henzell's living in Newcastle that more Henzells arrived direct from Alsace in France and landed at Dent's hole and Friar's Goose. Three families of Henzell, Tyzack and Capstaff are reported to have landed at Dent's hole now Newcastle Quay.

 

While the Henzeys of Stourbridge associated freely with the "native families" the Lorrainers of Newcastle‑on‑Tyne followed their centuries‑old traditions of preserving the secret of their craft. The Henzells, Tytteries and Tyzacs kept themselves so closely closed a community that they were called "The Strangers".

 

As late as 1710 at Newcastle permission was given by the Common Council to the glassmakers to erect at their own charge a gallery at the west end of St. Anne's Chapel for their own use".

 

In the sixteenth century a licence from the Bishop had empowered them to hold their own meetings for private worship at fixed times. In the Stourbridge district the Lorrainers joined with the English worshippers from the first.

 

It seems logical that all the families, whether they went directly or via Sussex, Stourbridge and then later to Newcastle, had their origins in Alsace.

 

The following is another newspaper article publishes in an English newspaper. Mrs. Myna Poynter of 43 Partridge Drive, Legana, Tasmania 7277 provided the article.

 

HENZELL

 

Once glass-making was established in England the bitter religious persecutions on the Continent drove many of the Huguenots overseas and some of these settled at the mouth of the stream which joins the Tyne at Howdon.  Glass making was on of the few crafts which the nobles on the Continent could engage and two of these families settled here - the Henzell and the Tyzacks - were both of this class, and were landowners in the Vosges in Lorraine.  Their coats-of-arms were the same. Three acorns slipped two billets in chief impaling a fesse inter three lambs passant, no colors.  The crest was a lire bolt and fire ball.  Family motto: "Seigneur je prie guard ma vie". (Lord, I beseech Thee protect my life).  No doubt the Henzells and Tyzacks were closely related to each other.

 

Thus some time after the year 1600 we have glass making established at Howdon Panns in the hands of just the two families from Lorraine.  The glass made was chiefly flat, or window glass, for which there was an increasing demand, although at the time only the mansion houses of the rich had glass in their windows.

 

The glass making company continued to prosper and grow.  During the three years 1700-1703 the Wallsend register of baptisms shows that of the twenty-five children born at Howdon, the fathers of twelve of them were employed by the Henzell business.

 

After being established at Howdon Panns for nearly two hundred years, the glass houses were approaching their end.  The works were old and out of date, the broad glass (window glass) was being made by better processes.  Hence about the year 1780 a company was formed to take over the Howden broad glass houses, also the old high and low glass works at Newcastle.  The new company built four large glass houses with offices, warehouses etc., at Lemington in Newburn (few miles west of Newcastle). This new establishment was, at the time, said to be the most complete glass manufactory in England, and Joshua Henzell of Howdon was put at the head of the concern, trading as the Northumberland Glass Company, and it was under the direction of Joshua Henzell and fellow directors that the Howdon glass-houses were closed.

 

For about one hundred and eighty years the Henzell family had carried on the glass-houses.  They had resided in the village and had been intimately concerned with the progress of the place, the people and Howdon.

 

Lorraine Medieval kingdom was on the west bank of the Rhine extending from the North Sea to Italy.  In the 10th century it was divided into two duchies, Upper and Lower Lorraine.  Upper Lorraine as a province of France, passed to the French crown in 1766.  Germany acquired part of Lower Lorraine with Alsace in 1871 but was restored to France after the war of 1914-1918.

     [1]Polak, Ada - Glass its makers and its public.

     [2]Godfry, Eleanor S - The Development of English Glassmaking 1560-1640, Clarendon Press, 1975.

 

     [3]The Denton Glass Excavation - The results of the excavation at a unique glassmaking site.

[4]Robertson R.A. - Chats on Old Glass, Ernst Benn Ltd., London Pages 67-69.

     [5]Gwynn, Robin D. - Huguenot Heritage

     [6]Op cit. Godfry, page 162-3.

     [7]Klein, Dan & Lloyd, Ward - The History of Glass

     [8]Guttery D.R. - From Broad-glass to Cut Crystal, op cit.

     [9]The Brettell family appear to have been connected with the Henzeys before, through the marriage of Johsua Henzey with Joan Brettell, who died in 1671.

     [10]Thomas Brettell was, I believe, the first of the family who resided at Finstall, and was great grandfather of the present possessor.

     [11]"Jonathan Dixon, of Kidderminster, and Mary Henzey, of this parish, were married at the College by me, Oct. 7, 1737, by license, Thomas Smith." (From the parish register of St. Michael's, Worchester.) - Noakes's "Notes and Queries for Worchestershire", page 3.

     [12]A gentleman of this name was, till about twenty years ago, an eminent glass-manufacturer of South Staffordshire.

     [13]These arms are in the Duke of Lorrain's gallery, annealed in glass. The motto, and a work called "The Book of Family Mottoes", is assigned to Tyzack.

     [14]On some of their seals appears "a demi griffin on a wreath", and on older ones "az. 3 lions ramp." impailing "a lion rampant."

     [15]Source not known.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 9
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!